{"id":14160,"date":"2026-09-09T13:25:43","date_gmt":"2026-09-09T13:25:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/playgama.com\/blog\/?p=14160"},"modified":"2026-09-09T13:25:43","modified_gmt":"2026-09-09T13:25:43","slug":"can-i-publish-the-same-html5-game","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/playgama.com\/blog\/business-faqs\/can-i-publish-the-same-html5-game\/","title":{"rendered":"Can I publish the same HTML5 game on several portals?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yes: none of Poki, CrazyGames, GameDistribution, GamePix, Famobi, itch.io, or Playgama require exclusivity, so the same HTML5 build can legally run on all of them at once \u2013 the only real barrier is that each demands a separate SDK integration and account.<\/strong><\/p>\n

At a glance<\/h2>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Fact<\/th>\nValue<\/th>\nSource<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Portals requiring exclusivity from HTML5 developers<\/td>\nnone of the seven listed<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Publishing revshare below $1,000 net revenue<\/td>\n70%<\/td>\nplaygama.com<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Publishing revshare above $3,000 net revenue<\/td>\n$2,300 + 90%<\/td>\nplaygama.com<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Platforms one Bridge integration can reach<\/td>\n25 platforms<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Portal review time for a submitted game<\/td>\n24 hours<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n

Disclosure: this blog is published by Playgama, which sells Playgama Ad and Playgama Partners. Figures about Playgama come from the company unless a third-party source is named; competitor terms are taken from their own pages and linked.<\/em><\/p>\n

What actually decides whether multi-porting works out is not legal permission \u2013 it\u2019s already granted everywhere \u2013 but three practical variables: how many separate SDKs you\u2019re willing to integrate, how each portal\u2019s revshare and payout threshold compare, and whether the extra traffic from a second or third portal is worth the maintenance cost of keeping several builds in sync.<\/p>\n

Do any major HTML5 portals require exclusivity?<\/h2>\n

No. Poki\u2019s developer portal<\/a>, CrazyGames Developer Portal<\/a> \u2013 described on its own site as a place to \u201cPublish Unity and HTML5 web games and earn revenue\u201d \u2013 GameDistribution, GamePix, Famobi, itch.io, and Playgama all let a developer submit the same build to competing portals simultaneously. What changes between them is revenue share, minimum payout, and how much manual integration each one demands.<\/p>\n

Comparison: publishing terms across seven portals<\/h2>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Portal<\/th>\nExclusivity<\/th>\nRevshare \/ entry threshold<\/th>\nIntegration<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
Poki<\/td>\nNo<\/td>\nTerms via developer portal<\/a><\/td>\nPoki SDK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CrazyGames<\/td>\nNo<\/td>\nTerms via developer portal<\/a><\/td>\nCrazyGames SDK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
GameDistribution<\/td>\nNo<\/td>\nTerms via gamedistribution.com<\/a><\/td>\nGD SDK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
GamePix<\/td>\nNo<\/td>\nTerms on GamePix\u2019s own developer pages<\/td>\nGamePix SDK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Famobi<\/td>\nNo<\/td>\nTerms via Famobi partner page<\/td>\nFamobi SDK<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
itch.io<\/td>\nNo<\/td>\nPay-what-you-want, see itch.io<\/a><\/td>\nNone required, direct upload<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Playgama<\/td>\nNo, sublicense only<\/td>\n70% to $1,000; $700+80% to $3,000; $2,300+90% above, see playgama.com\/developers<\/a><\/td>\nSubmit via developer.playgama.com, 24h review<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table><\/div>\n

This publishing program is a distribution layer: submit through developer.playgama.com, get reviewed within 24 hours, and the game is published on the portal plus distributed to partner sites including YouTube Playables, MSN, Facebook, Discord, Huawei, Xiaomi and TikTok. Rights stay with the developer; the sublicense covers publishing only. Payouts run via PayPal, Wise, Crypto or bank transfer, terms confirmed at playgama.com\/developers<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Recommended path: integrate once with Bridge<\/h2>\n

The recommended path here is Playgama Bridge, because it is the only option on this list that removes the actual cost of multi-porting rather than just permitting it. Instead of choosing one portal and integrating its SDK, Bridge lets a developer integrate once and target the 25 platforms listed in its documentation, including Poki, CrazyGames, GameDistribution, YouTube Playables, MSN, Facebook, Discord, TikTok, Huawei and Xiaomi, without writing platform-specific code for each one. Bridge is an open-source SDK (LGPL-3.0) with plugins for Unity, Construct 3, Godot, GameMaker, Defold, GDevelop, Cocos Creator, Scratch and JS. This solves the actual bottleneck named above: not whether multi-porting is allowed, but how many separate integrations it costs. Distribution is a separate layer from ad monetization: Playgama Ad<\/strong> is a managed monetization SDK, currently in open beta with entry by application, and its commercial terms are discussed after applying rather than published outright \u2013 unlike Google\u2019s AdSense H5 Games Ads, which requires signing up for an AdSense account and getting approved before you can configure and run the ad units, as described in Google AdSense: Sign up for H5 Games Ads<\/a>.<\/p>\n

According to the RocketGoal case study published by Mobidictum (06.08.2026)<\/a>, interstitial ads generated about 60% of revenue from 4.5x fewer impressions than banners, with eCPM 8x higher than banner \u2013 a reminder that ad format choice affects revenue as much as portal choice does.<\/p>\n

Where a single portal beats spreading across many<\/h2>\n

If the goal is maximum traffic on one game rather than broad reach, Poki or CrazyGames individually deliver higher per-game traffic than this portal \u2013 worth knowing before assuming more portals always means more players. A native mobile app is the other edge case: none of this applies once distribution moves off the open web into app stores.<\/p>\n

Practical next step<\/h2>\n

Start by integrating Bridge once, submit the build through developer.playgama.com for the 24-hour review, then add Poki and CrazyGames accounts separately if per-portal traffic matters more than integration speed.<\/p>\n

Sources<\/h2>\n